Prioritisation
Identify what matters most when objectives compete and time is limited, from the opening ranking through later trade-offs.
McKinsey now runs two versions of the Sustainable Futures Lab. Understand the original 20-minute format and the 30-minute Lab Leader format, then prepare for the one your invitation points to.
Last updated: September 2026
McKinsey Solve walkthrough
The McKinsey Sustainable Futures Lab, usually shortened to SFL, is a scenario-based module within the McKinsey Solve digital assessment. The established version uses environmental research-style context to present judgement decisions rather than test environmental knowledge.
There are now two versions, and each candidate is given one of them: the original 20-minute, 13-question format, and Lab Leader, an approximately 30-minute three-day team-management format that appears in 95-minute invitations. This page covers the original in depth; the Lab Leader guide covers the other.
Redrock and Sea Wolf emphasise quantitative analysis and constraint logic. SFL is closer to a situational judgement exercise: prompts reveal information progressively, decisions may influence later options, and trade-offs involve impact, feasibility, timing, and people.
| Module | Focus | Nature | Skills emphasised |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redrock | Data and reporting | Quantitative case study | Numerical reasoning and evidence selection |
| Sea Wolf | Treatment constraints | Rule-based optimisation | Logic, arithmetic, and pattern recognition |
| SFL | Judgement and priorities | Behavioural scenario | Ambiguity, trade-offs, and stakeholders |
The complete McKinsey Solve guide explains where SFL sits beside the other modules.
Your invitation and on-screen instructions are the source of truth. The duration tells you which of the two versions you will see.
65 min
Redrock + Sea Wolf
Commonly reported without SFL.
85 min
Original SFL
The 20-minute, 13-question format on this page.
95 min
Lab Leader
The approximately 30-minute three-day format.
Earlier choices can shape later context. The key operational challenge is maintaining a coherent decision framework rather than trying to discover one hidden perfect answer.
Lab Leader is a team-management simulation with four Researchers and four Workstations. It runs across Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3, with Notes, placements, and team signals carrying forward. Each day runs the same four stages.
The Lab Leader guide walks through each stage, what it tests, and how to practise it. The detailed 95-minute Sustainable Futures Lab report has the original candidate accounts.
McKinsey does not publish an official SFL scoring rubric. Solve Games Guide uses these three traits as a shared language for reviewing practice decisions; they are not claims about McKinsey’s internal labels.
Identify what matters most when objectives compete and time is limited, from the opening ranking through later trade-offs.
Move forward responsibly when information is incomplete or changing, balancing action with adaptability.
Notice inclusion, friction, alignment, and how decisions land with the people affected.
Separate what the prompt states from the criteria you use to decide. Clear, consistent judgement is more useful than memorising a rigid framework.
Compare options using impact, feasibility, risk, and reversibility. Earlier decisions provide context, but new evidence can justify a thoughtful update.
Most candidates find SFL more intuitive than Redrock or Sea Wolf. Give it enough practice to make the workflow familiar without displacing preparation for the more specialised quantitative modules.
Read the duration and instructions in your invitation. Use the 65/85/95-minute patterns only as preparation guidance.
Understand the mission briefing, opening ranking, and interconnected multiple-choice decisions before starting a timed run.
Practise the 20-minute, 13-question format in one sitting, then review the criteria behind your choices rather than only the result.
Use broader SJT-style practice for ambiguity and stakeholders. If your invitation states 95 minutes, switch to the Lab Leader guide and practise that format instead.
McKinsey does not publish how either SFL format is scored. There is no verified public answer key, score calculator, weighting model, or evidence that one team allocation is universally optimal.
Useful dimensions for reviewing your own practice
As of September 2026, McKinsey has not published scoring for either SFL format, and there is no verified score-correlation data to share. The simulator’s trait feedback is a practice model, not a reconstruction of McKinsey’s rubric.
In summary: check your invitation duration, practise the matching format, and always follow the instructions you actually receive. For 95-minute invitations, start with the Lab Leader guide.
The simulator covers both versions. Original-format missions give you the complete 20-minute, 13-question run: mission context, opening ranking, evolving choices, and trait-aligned feedback. Lab Leader missions give you the full three-day loop with four Researchers and four Workstations, a Practice mode with a pause button, and a review of every placement and Support decision. See the Lab Leader guide for that format.

The 95-minute three-day format: every stage, what it tests, and how to practise it.
The detailed candidate-reported workflow and current unknowns.
A deeper guide to prioritisation, ambiguity, and stakeholders.
Allocate preparation across SFL, Redrock, and Sea Wolf.
A focused explainer for the module’s purpose and terminology.
Answers about the reported formats, invitation timing, preparation, and current practice coverage.
The Sustainable Futures Lab (SFL) is a judgement module in the McKinsey Solve Game. It now has two versions: the original 20-minute, 13-question format, and Lab Leader, an approximately 30-minute three-day team-management format that appears in 95-minute invitations. Each candidate receives one version.
Check the total time in your invitation email. Candidate reports associate 65 minutes with Redrock and Sea Wolf only, 85 minutes with the original 20-minute SFL, and 95 minutes with the approximately 30-minute Lab Leader format.
No. There are two versions and each candidate is given one of them. The invitation duration tells you which: 85 minutes for the original format, 95 minutes for Lab Leader. Follow your invitation and on-screen instructions.
It shares characteristics with situational judgement tests but is not identical. Both reported SFL formats involve decisions under uncertainty, prioritisation, and stakeholder considerations, but their interfaces and workflows differ.
Most candidates report SFL as the most intuitive of the three modules. It does not require the numerical fluency of Redrock or the constraint logic of Sea Wolf. Maintaining consistent criteria across interconnected decisions is its own challenge.
Practise the version your invitation points to. The simulator covers both: the original 20-minute, 13-question format and five Lab Leader missions with the full three-day loop. If your invitation states 95 minutes, start with the Lab Leader guide.
McKinsey does not publish a practice version. Solve Games Guide includes one free scenario for the original 20-minute, 13-question format, with no credit card required. Lab Leader missions are included in the paid tiers.
Select the package that fits your preparation needs. All packages include 2-week access.
You only get one attempt at the McKinsey Solve Games. This costs less than a single interview coaching session, and prepares you for the actual filter.
The complete toolkit: simulations, solver, cases, and both unique versions of the Sustainable Futures Lab game. Everything you need to prepare with confidence.
Three-hour prep for candidates who want one Redrock case per template, two Sustainable Futures Lab missions, and the Sea Wolf solver.
Start one free timed scenario for the original 20-minute, 13-question format.